Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Cop Land


« Nancy Pelosi Is A Dangerous Idiot | Main | Nerd Robs 7-11 With Klingon Weapon »

Humpday History Highlight

By Wyatt Earp | February 4, 2009

As I did last week, this excerpt will be from my new favorite book, Enjoy!

E188

1789 - Congress Determines How To Address The President

Many people, Vice President John Adams foremost among them, thought that referring to Washington as “president” simply wasn’t enough. Adams argued that it was important to give the highest office in the land a title with more “dignity and splendor.”

South Carolina senator Ralph Izard proposed calling the president, “His Excellency.” George Washington initially favored the title of “His High Mightiness.” A Senate committee came back with this mouthful: “His Highness the President of the United States of America and Protector of the Rights of Same.”

After much debate, Congress decided that these titles reeked of monarchy, and settled for the term we still use today: “Mr. President.”

Personally, I would appreciate it if you referred to me as “His High Mightiness.”

Topics: HHH |

15 Responses to “Humpday History Highlight”

  1. Old NFO Says:
    February 4th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    Okay, his high madness it is… :-)

  2. Deanna Says:
    February 4th, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    Reminds me of what my Daddy used to say: “Don’t care what you call me. Just don’t call me late for dinner.”

  3. Ky Person Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 3:32 am

    John Adams wanted the president to have an exalted title. Adams could be a bit abrasive about it, and since he was on the heavy side, his political foes called him His Rotundity.

  4. USA_Admiral Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 5:37 am

    Old George had a way with words.

  5. Alan B Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 6:22 am

    The Marshall said: Personally, I would appreciate it if you referred to me as “His High Mightiness.”

    Wouldn’t you prefer, “His High skininess”?

  6. GroovyVic Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 7:24 am

    You’d better watch it, Obama catch wind of this and demand to be called “His Highness the President of the United States of America and Protector of the Rights of Same.”

    Eeesh!

  7. wagonsux Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    How about Your immenseness, or Your Girth?

  8. Morgan Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    John Adams must have believed that since our new nation should be on equal par with the European monarchies, a title similar to those bestowed on the kings and queens of Europe was needed. Fortunately, George Washington was humble enough to never want such a title for the office.

    Wyatt, his high mightiness? How about Mr. Administrator?

  9. Morgan Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 10:14 am

    Let me rewrite this:

    John Adams must have believed that since our new nation should be on equal par with the European monarchies, a title similar to those bestowed on the kings and queens of Europe was needed. Fortunately, George Washington was humble enough to never want such a title for the office.

    Wyatt, his high mightiness? How about Mr. Administrator?

  10. kaveman Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 11:27 am

    Love the obscure history stuff. Makes me feel more smarter.

    I would just like to remind everyone that in America, we can refer to the President by any name we damn well please.

    For now.

  11. Elm Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    He could have been “King George” if he had wanted . I sincerely hope that Obama or any other Democrat doesn’t know this. They’ll try to pass a “King Barack” bill.

  12. Wyatt Earp Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    Old NFO - That is disturbingly accurate.

    Deanna - Mmm . . . dinner!

    Ky person - Go figure. Wagonsux calls me the same thing.

    Admiral - Yes he did. And he always knew how many states we had.

    Alan B - Nah, I would appreciate “His High Not-So-Fatness,” though.

    GroovyVic - And have a ready-made seal for the title, too!

    Wagonsux - Hey! I’m less immense now!!!

    Morgan - Lord Administrator, you serf!

    Kaveman - Well, if the Left can refer to Bush as “Hitler,” we can pretty much have a wide berth.

  13. Alan B Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    Elm says:

    He could have been “King George” if he had wanted

    I don’t understand Americans. You get rid of our King George and set up your own! Tock Tock

  14. Mike47 Says:
    February 5th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    Long ago a Catholic friend of mine (who grew up somewhere in the East) would address people who really annoyed him as “Yes, Your A**holiness!” I couldn’t help cracking up.

  15. Elm Says:
    February 6th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    Alan B said

    “I don’t understand Americans. You get rid of our King George and set up your own! Tock Tock”

    See, that’s the thing. We got rid of Britain’s George because he made us pay taxes. OUR George made us pay taxes but we liked it because it was OUR George. And now we just love paying taxes. snicker

    p.s. I don’t understand American LIBERALS. Most regular, non-Liberal Americans are normal and sane.

Comments