Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Cop Land


« | Main | »

Shoes: Better Than Sex?

By Wyatt Earp | August 12, 2008

<i>I knew there was a reason why Al Bundy got all the babes.</i>

I knew there was a reason why Al Bundy got all the babes.

God Lord, what kind of terrible sex is this broad getting?

(LifeWire) — When it comes to the natural highs, Gracienne Myers says sex just doesn’t cut it. Shoes, on the other hand, get her heart racing.

The 34-year-old Brazilian native who now calls State College, Pennsylvania, home says there’s just something about heels, sandals, platforms and wedges that give her a rush.

“They’re thrilling,” says the entrepreneur, who recently started designing her own line of shoes and selling them online and through a handful of retail locations.

She still remembers the rush she got when she found a pair of strappy gold heel sandals at a boutique in Brazil. “I’ll never forget it,” she recalls, “that feeling of being powerful and sexy in those shoes.” (H/TCNN)

The article then goes on to highlight other “natural highs,” but the first example made my brain hurt, so I had to stop.

Of course, this freak lives in State College, home of Penn State University. I always knew there was something wrong with those people, and now I have the proof!

Topics: Snarkasm | 12 Comments »

12 Responses to “Shoes: Better Than Sex?”

  1. Bloviating Zeppelin Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    Gracienne: stay away. Stay far away.

    BZ

  2. -->Doghouse --> Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    So let me get this straight; the shoes make her feel sexy, and her feeling sexy leads to … nothing?

  3. GroovyVic Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    GO BUCKEYES!!

  4. rightwingprof Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    I know her. She’s certifiably insane.

  5. AJ Lynch Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    Al Bundy – in the Top Ten All Time Sitcom Stars?

  6. miriam Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 4:03 pm

    All of your commentors are obviously men. What’s wrong with shoes? I mean sex is nice, but I am devoted to shoes.One can have shoes and sex, or sex without shoes, or shoes without sex. All nice.

  7. RT Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 7:46 pm

    “…what kind of terrible sex is this broad getting?

    Sounds like the same sex I’m getting. ;)

    I prefer to be barefoot.

  8. Snigs Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    Shoes last years- sex, sometimes 2 minutes if you’re lucky.

    Not to mention, a pair of shoes doesn’t mind if you have several other pairs of shoes and they never get pissy because you’d prefer to try out a new pair just to see if you like them better.

    I can see where shoes could be better than sex.

  9. Wyatt Earp Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 9:14 pm

    BZ – Like the frakkin’ plague!

    Doghouse – Broad needs a crazy man.

    GroovyVic – Don’t you blaspheme here!

    Prof – That figures. You know all the nuts out there!

    AJ – Easily in the Top Five.

    Miriam – Wow, that actually makes some sense. And it scares me. :)

    RT – And pregnant?

    Snigs – Two minutes? Lightweight. I go at least 2 minutes, 15 seconds. (That is counting the post-sex shower, though.)

  10. RT Says:
    August 12th, 2008 at 10:37 pm

    No babies!

  11. Ky Person Says:
    August 13th, 2008 at 5:49 am

    Feh. I am that rare woman, one who is not a shoe or purse fanatic.

  12. Wyatt Earp Says:
    August 13th, 2008 at 11:22 am

    RT – Why not? They’re hours and hours of fun!!

    Ky person – I’m not either. Heh.