Anti-Obama Rally Held In Jerusalem
By Wyatt Earp | July 28, 2009
Apparently, President Hope Change has not converted the people of Israel to his “citizen of the world” approach to diplomacy.
Can you blame them? Obama and his brainwashed minions are spending most of their time placating that Holocaust denying psychopath Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, instead of throwing American support where it belongs – with our Israeli allies.
A mere six months after The One takes office, and one of our staunchest allies is protesting him and his limp-wristed diplomatic positions. Wow.
JERUSALEM – President Obama’s policies against Jewish construction in eastern Jerusalem and the strategic West Bank were slammed as “racist” today by participants in a rally drawing about 2,000 Israelis in front of the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem.
Obama’s policies are “racist.” Heh, considering the events of the past week, I would say Karmatown just welcomed a new resident.
“George Mitchell go home!” yelled protestors in front of the U.S. government building.
Mitchell, Obama’s envoy to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, is here discussing the American administration’s
call for a halt to all Jewish settlement activity, including natural growth or accommodating the needs of existing Jewish populations in the areas in question.“Obama should not be pressing Israel to compromise and freeze building in Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem,” protest organizer Yaacov Steinberg told WND.
And here is the proverbial money shot:
“It’s absolutely an outrageously racist policy,” Mort Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America, told WND. “Especially in light of how Obama should be sensitive when it comes to anything that would remotely constitute discrimination of people based on ethnicity or religion.”
Ouch! Dare I say the Obama-Israel honeymoon is over? I wonder what Obama’s good friends Henry Gates and Jeremiah Wright have to say about this? Surely they must be appalled at this shoddy treatment of the Jews.
/snark.
Topics: Politics | 9 Comments »
July 28th, 2009 at 7:46 am
Rasmussen had him at -11 the other day, and he is dropping dropping dropping. I heard a little blurb on the radio last night where we will be required to list all our guns on our 2009 tax returns. A caller from an eastern european country remembers as a child how the Russians did that prior to confiscation. Our Marxist in Chief is getting more transparent every minute. The news is that it is being attached as an amendment to another bill already passed with a provision, no publicity till 60 days after it is passed as an amendment. Transparency alright, transparently marxist. Even if it means I become a felon overnight by not reporting..the hell with them, and I am sure 10′s of millions more share my beliefs. When SWAT surrounds my house I’ll hold out until they fly you in to arrest me Wyatt:) LOL What time is good for you?
July 28th, 2009 at 10:03 am
A friend who heard the same thing the other day about gun registration called the NRA chapter in his area, they heard the same thing..it is a rumour..ignore my post above. It just seemed soooo like what obambi would do though it got me.
July 28th, 2009 at 10:27 am
Wann’a Bet? O’Bambi’s friends might say about anything but never understand what the other person is thinking. It is quicker to cry racist than to understand what is happening in the other guy’s world.
I am glad that Jon posted his second comment. No one, including o’Bambi and his crowd would be so stupid as to ask us to all lie on our tax returns. I just wonder how many of you have your guns listed on your insurance companies roster of things you have in the house? Why is is so tough to buy ammo right now? Do you have to complete paper work when you buy it?
MUD
July 28th, 2009 at 11:29 am
Jon – Good to hear it’s a rumor. I hope. As for a time, I can come over anytime before hockey season. You’re good from October through May.
MUD – It’s so tough to buy ammo now because it is in shorter supply. After the election, people went out and bought as much as they could, fearing that Obama would take away their guns.
Luckily for me, the department gives us two boxes of ammo every time we “plink.” (Shoot at the range on our day off.)
July 28th, 2009 at 12:41 pm
More important than a shortage of ammo is a shortage of reloading components. Particularly primers. My Dad was telling me last week, that the primer is the most controllable component, because it’s not something you can create yourself very easy (as opposed to forming your own bullets). And there are only a few manufacturing plants in the world.
Cut off the supply of primers and you effectively impose gun control. With the possible exception of muzzle loaders.
July 28th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
WalterC – Looks like we have a new business venture for the struggling economy.
July 28th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
SB-2099 … FALSE: http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/taxreturns.asp
Good thing too. So it looks like you are in the clear Mr Brooks. Now about that still you have out behind that barn …
July 28th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
In the UK it is a classic approach by this Government to leak a rumour of some proposed change to the Law. This serves a number of purposes:
1) If the people do not respond then the Government can just go ahead, knowing there will be little negative reaction.
2) If the people respond vigorously, the Government can simply deny it and say people are over-reacting or, “This Government would never take that action” [unspoken: but they ARE planning something almost identical if they can get away with it].
3) On the longer term for 2), the Government will try again later after they have put out various Green Papers, White Papers, reports from Quangos, papers by leading experts in the field (who happen to want the same kind of statist controls as the Government does), all backed by propaganda from The Guardian, The Independent and the BBC.
This is what the government did over smoking, second hand smoking (for which there is no evidence of a problem) and third hand smoking which is utter nonsense.
They are now doing it on alcohol which they are trying to denormalise and control. You can now be fined in some parts of towns for possessing alcohol in public. In Brighton, it applies to the whole town. Thus, you can buy a couple of cans of beer at a supermarket (totally legal) and have it confiscated and be fined as you leave the store!
UTTER IDIOCY but it happens.
July 28th, 2009 at 2:49 pm
If you want to learn more, try reading some English blogs:
Try reading some English blogger’s comments:
http://dickpuddlecote.blogspot.com/2009/07/looking-through-ian-gilmores-eyes.html
(Background and further links to the de-nomalisation of alcohol. Beware, bad language but not as bad as some).
Also:
http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/
(Also good but less bad language. Deserves to be better known .)
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/
(Written by a man who is not a Bishop and is not called “Hill”. Carefully avoids bad language. Is particularly concerned about the attempts to gradually clamp down on home schooling – which is already difficult over here. “Climate Cuttings” posts good if you are not a regular reader on the issues.)
http://devilskitchen.me.uk/
(The ultimate swear blog. Once awarded the prize for the blogger most likely to be suffering from Turette’s Syndrome. DEFINITELY not recommended for those who are offended by bad language and lurid threats. Not as bad as he used to be …)