Hollywood’s Best Natural Bikini Bods
By Wyatt Earp | April 29, 2009
Audrina Patridge. Winner, winner, chicken dinner!
Natural, fake, whatever. It’s all good to me.
In Hollywood, there are two kinds of people: those who have been nipped and tucked, and those who go au natural. Both require a certain faith.
One trusts that her plastic surgeon knows what he’s doing. The other believes that what God gave you is as good as its going to get.
Audrina Patridge and Jennifer Aniston are both putting their faith in the Lord, at least when it comes to their bikini bodies.
Hollywood celebrity trainer Barry Jay rated his Top 15 non-enhanced bikini bods. He told Radaronline.com that Patridge “is a good example of healthy diet. She has nice, lean thighs. You don’t have to lift heavy weights for that, but you really gotta watch the diet.” (H/T – FOXNews)
Patridge (above) is pretty fantastic, but my next favorite on the list has to be Kelly Brook. Yummay!
Oh yeah, that’s nice.
Topics: Babes | 10 Comments »
April 29th, 2009 at 8:05 am
Yes, Kelly Brook (whoever that may be) is rocking that bikini nicely. Good choice Wyatt!
April 29th, 2009 at 9:15 am
Audrina? Really? She’s fine with the original equipment bod, but she ought to consider a little cosmetic surgery to that moniker. Just sayin’. . .
April 29th, 2009 at 10:10 am
I’d pick the babbling Brook.
April 29th, 2009 at 10:36 am
I prefer natural over plastic, but it’s OK if done in moderation.
The one thing I can’t stand at all are fake lips. Collagen injections, or whatever it is makes them look like catfish.
April 29th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Kelly is smokin!!!! Nice find…
April 29th, 2009 at 7:50 pm
So what do you say son, real or fake?
…
You’re right, it don’t matter.
April 29th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
“look like catfish” – what an absolutely appropriate description. Well done, sir.
April 29th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
Catfish..LOL Or what their lips would look like when exposed to the vacuum of space. Hmmm Kellys chest looks like it was exposed to the vacuum of space too:)
Just keeping it scientific and clinical here.
April 29th, 2009 at 10:06 pm
Are you kidding? What a poor augmentation! Obviously a subglandular augmentation with a “rock in a sock” appearance. If she had them placed under the muscle, as reputable plastic surgeons do, she would have had a good long lasting result. She looks terrible!
April 29th, 2009 at 11:17 pm
Kelly, on the other hand, is either well endowed, or has a good plastic surgeon.