Pam Anderson: “Dogs Cannot Use Condoms”
By Wyatt Earp | January 19, 2009
A rare photo of Pam Anderson wearing clothes.
Yet another wisdom nugget from a vapid Hollywood whore.
MUMBAI – US actress Pamela Anderson has appealed to the authorities in India’s financial capital Mumbai not to put down nuisance stray dogs, instead calling for them to be sterilised.
“It is well established that killing stray dogs is not a permanent solution to controlling their populations,” the former “Baywatch” star said in a letter to the municipal commission of Greater Mumbai.
“Dogs cannot use condoms, but with the municipality’s help, they can be ‘fixed’ — painlessly, quickly and permanently,” she added in the letter made public by activist group the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). (H/T – )
The irony in this story is that if Pam made Tommy Lee use a condom, she wouldn’t have contracted Hepatitis C.
I’m just sayin’.
Topics: WTF? | 14 Comments »
January 19th, 2009 at 8:01 am
Gee, no kidding, dogs can’t use condoms! Maybe somebody should tell her that dogs know when to “play around” and when not to, unlike some “rational” people.
January 19th, 2009 at 9:11 am
But she voted for Obama, so how dumb can she really be?
(P.S. Appreciate your not questioning in any way how Ms. Anderson actually knows dogs can’t use condoms. Visions of The Happy Hooker. Thanks, Wyatt.)
January 19th, 2009 at 9:28 am
Morgan – Yeah, if I had a nickel for every time I humped a strange girls’ leg . . .
Maggie Mama – Not a problem. I’m here to help.
January 19th, 2009 at 9:42 am
She is a friggin genius. She should be in Obama’s cabinet somewhere.
January 19th, 2009 at 9:49 am
At least she learned from experience.
January 19th, 2009 at 9:53 am
Admiral – Secretary of Whoring.
Doghouse – She is a “pro,” in every sense of the word.
January 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
Ewh, she sat on the counter. You never know where that thing has been. How does she know sterilization is painless? MUD
January 19th, 2009 at 10:22 am
Ms P Anderson said:
“It is well established that killing stray dogs is not a permanent solution to controlling their populations”
Result of killing stray dogs:
1) fewer dogs on the streets
2) fewer dogs producing new litters
Seems a good start to me.
January 19th, 2009 at 11:50 am
*rolls eyes* wish her mom woulda used one…
January 19th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
hehehe- love the “humor” however inadvertent…
January 19th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Jeesh – that is one hottie in the picture but now she is just another Hollywood skank.
January 19th, 2009 at 4:53 pm
Hell, there are some countries where {stray dogs}={free food}.
January 20th, 2009 at 11:01 am
MUD – I’m never eating at that establishment!
Alan B – She must be missing the logic in it.
Smite – That was the first thing to cross my mind when reading the article. I’m sure her parents are proud of her. Heh.
Old NFO – Very inadvertant.
AJ – When she first appeared in Playboy, she was beautiful, now, she’s a plastic vapid ho.
BobG – They call that the #4.
March 4th, 2009 at 8:02 pm
The humour is cool. But so is the point – why don’t authorities put down stray ppl – I mean the same logic should be good their too, (more so in Mumbai, India – than anywhere else – they were way past 100million mark like 2 years ago!!! Right! ? The fewer people on the streets, the fewer baby-giving-factories (read : fewer females between 13 to 45 who pump out yet another bastard every ten months) fewer the number of rodent like human pests