Malin Akerman Lands Deep Role
By Wyatt Earp | November 22, 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bec72/bec726260d29c617a1a3528d4ea89f6df0031e01" alt="Malin-Akerman-Maxim"
Swedish bombshell Malin Akerman has some crazy shoes to fill. You see, Akerman has just signed on to play classic pr0n star Linda Lovelace in a film about her life. The role was previously held by hot mess – but mostly mess – Lindsay Lohan. Lohan was perfect for this part because it is only a matter of time until she is doing hard core films.
Akerman is no Lohan – thank God – but she is taking an awful risk by accepting this role. Then again, she’ll probably have to be naked through the entire film, .
After “Inferno” director Matthew Wilder announced he was moving forward with the Linda Lovelace biopic without Lindsay Lohan on Saturday, the troubled starlet has reportedly already been replaced by blond stunner Malin Akerman, according to People. Malin, 32, is best known for playing Vince Vaughn’s on-screen wife in “Couples Retreat,” and the smoldering Laurie Jupiter/Silk Spectre in 2009′s sci-fi superhero film, “Watchmen.”
“Malin was passionate to take this challenge of the role to task,” Chris told the mag. “And we feel she has the talent to meet that challenge.”
She has the “talent” to play a pr0n star? What the hell happened in that casting call?
Topics: Babes | 14 Comments »
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:19 pm
HEADS UP OT…PHILLY WOMAN @ AIRPORT=TSA
http://tinyurl.com/27cbljl
fIGURED YOU MAY KNOW SOMETING ABOUT THIS. Sorry couldn’t get you regular mail.
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:35 pm
Hutch – That is friiggin’ insane!
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:36 pm
Maybe Lindsay can clean up her act in time for a Marilyn Chambers biopic.
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:41 pm
This film has potential to be awesome and potential to be another Showgirls. At least no Lohan though.
I think Lohan should be in a Joan of Arc biopic, with no stunt doubles used in the ‘FINAL SCENE”.
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:17 pm
Lohan wouldn’t make it to the “FINAL SCENE.” She’s doing too good a job of burning herself up as it is. It’s not like she needs the help…
November 22nd, 2010 at 4:30 pm
Must show restraint….
November 22nd, 2010 at 4:34 pm
Akerman’s not much of an actress, but she agreed to double as a fluffer in between takes.
November 22nd, 2010 at 4:59 pm
And she thought that role in Harold and Kumar would never amount to anything.
November 22nd, 2010 at 5:03 pm
Then again, she’ll probably have to be naked through the entire film…………………….
This is a management ploy to cut back on wardrobe expenses.
November 22nd, 2010 at 5:32 pm
I’ll take one for the team and review it when it comes out!
November 22nd, 2010 at 5:42 pm
John D brought up Marylin Chambers….
Does anyone remember that she started out as the Ivory Soap Girl and then she was moonlighting ( no pun intended, ok, I intended) and she became successful as a porn star and her success blew her cover (ibid) and she got canned (three’s a charm) by Ivory Soap ?
November 22nd, 2010 at 6:18 pm
Parts of me are still applauding this announcementdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/404d5/404d500e3c379c6987f22023e5543aaed2360f7b" alt=":P"
November 23rd, 2010 at 6:34 pm
proof…+10
November 23rd, 2010 at 7:39 pm
John D – One can only hope.
Dr. Evil – Agreed. You collect the wood, and I’ll get the torches.
Wes S. – Good point.
RT – No need.
Mrs. Crankipants – She’s a trooper.
LFH – She sure showed them!
JT – And piss off the fashion lobby.
Proof – Good man!
JT – I remember. Huge scandal at the time.
Lou – Parts of you can applaud???
Roger – Agreed.