Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Cop Land

« | Main | »

Lindsay Lohan: Delusional Idiot

By Wyatt Earp | March 9, 2010

Get this: the actress/moron is suing E-Trade because she thinks the baby in the “Milkaholic” commercial is modeled after her. Seriously.

The commercial features a baby named Lindsay — who in the spot, is accused of being the “other woman” in a baby love triangle.

Lohan has filed a lawsuit in Nassau County Supreme Court in NY, first obtained by the NY Post, in which she claims E*TRADE violated Lohan’s rights by using her “name and characterization” in business without paying her or getting her approval.

Lohan’s lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, tells TMZ it doesn’t matter that the commercial doesn’t mention the name Lohan, adding, “Do you know the name Oprah? Do you know the name Madonna? Same thing.”

I cannot believe I am even dignifying this lawsuit with a response, but here goes. First of all, Lindsay Lohan is not a “first name only” celebrity like Cher, Madonna, or Wyatt. No one says “Lindsay,” and immediately thinks of this vapid bint. Secondly, Lindsay is a very common name in this day and age. If the baby was named Rumer, than Ms. Willis would have a case. Lohan? Not so much. And finally, even if it is modeled after her, why would she make a scene about it? Does she want to proudly proclaim that she has milkalcoholic tendencies?

God, this girl needs to be publicly shunned.

Topics: Snarkasm | 16 Comments »

16 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan: Delusional Idiot”

  1. RT Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    She’s never been known to exhibit sound judgment. Such an idiotic twit.

  2. Jon Brooks Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 9:15 pm


  3. Wyatt Earp Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 9:23 pm

    RT – In my opinion, she is only useful for showing her pink parts and driving while intoxicated.

    Jon – Pretty soon it will be, “Lindsay Who?”

  4. cbullitt Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 9:36 pm

    Who’s next…Linsdey Graham? He dumber than she is, at least her tits are on her chest.

  5. dragonlady474 Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    Just think of all the money I can make from those video game companies who use the word “dragon” in the title of their games! heh
    What a freakin’ moron!

    btw Wyatt, do you have a facebook site? If so, you should add me!

  6. mpur Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    I remember Lindsay Wagner from, what, 30 years ago?

  7. Wyatt Earp Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    cbullitt – It’s a toss-up of idiocy there.

    DL474 – I was briefly on Facebook, but I didn’t much care for it. Deleted my account. Sorry.

    Mpur – Yeah. Bionic hawtness.

  8. Peter B Says:
    March 10th, 2010 at 1:36 am

    Makes me think of Groucho’s classic letter to Warner Brothers

    Apparently there is more than one way of conquering a city and holding it as your own. For example, up to the time that we contemplated making this picture, I had no idea that the city of Casablanca belonged exclusively to Warner Brothers. However, it was only a few days after our announcement appeared that we received your long, ominous legal document warning us not to use the name Casablanca.

    It seems that in 1471, Ferdinand Balboa Warner, your great-great-grandfather, while looking for a shortcut to the city of Burbank, had stumbled on the shores of Africa and, raising his alpenstock (which he later turned in for a 100 shares of common), named it Casablanca.

    I just don’t understand your attitude. Even if you plan on releasing your picture, I am sure that the average movie fan could learn in time to distinguish between Ingrid Bergman and Harpo. I don’t know whether I could, but I certainly would like to try.

  9. metoo Says:
    March 10th, 2010 at 9:03 am

    How presumptuous on her part to assume the viewing public would think of her every time the name Lindsay is mentioned. Seems to me the problem is NO ONE is thinking of Ms. Lohan these days and this is just another cheap, tawdry way to get her name back in the news front and center. She needs to just go away because frankly, no one gives a rat’s ass about her.

  10. Dennis Petty, aka MUD Says:
    March 10th, 2010 at 9:04 am

    This is just another attempt by a pathetic actress to milk any publicity for all it’s worth. Give it a few days and it will go away, unfortunately, Lindsey won’t. MUD

  11. Mike Says:
    March 10th, 2010 at 10:43 am

    First person I thought of was Lindsay Wagner.

    Hey Lohan, your a SKANK! Go away already!

  12. Mrs. Crankipants Says:
    March 10th, 2010 at 11:11 am

    When I think of “Lindsay”, I think of a brand of olives that go in my very dry Absolut martini.

  13. Ingineer66 Says:
    March 10th, 2010 at 11:47 am

    Craziness. When I hear about an 18 month old named Lindsey, I always think of Lindsay Lohan.

  14. yeahright Says:
    March 10th, 2010 at 4:39 pm

    Pathetic. Enough said. Hey – Lindsay, here are some other words you should sue for, when people use them:

    Skank, Moron, Idiot, Slug, Stupid, Vapid, Vain, Shallow, Useless, Pathetic, Drunk, Arrested.

    These are all words that people think when your name is mentioned. Not just Milkaholic…

  15. Jon Brooks Says:
    March 10th, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    She’s trying to take ..milk.. from a baby???? Ohhhh I told em I did, once you let em take the candy from the baby, they will go after the milk too!

  16. bob (either orr) Says:
    March 11th, 2010 at 2:03 am

    Sign on Lindsay Lohan’s forehead: Space for rent within. Cheap. Never used (unlike the rest of her body).