Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Cop Land

« The EXACTO: Gun Pr0n Extraordinaire | Main | Hitler’s Paintings To Be Auctioned Off »

Gitmo Inmate: Obama Changed Nothing

By Wyatt Earp | April 16, 2009

mohhanned-el-gharaniThis handsome young devil is Mohammed al-Gharani, a scumbag terrorist piece of garbage who is currently spending his vacation from jihad at Club Gitmo. And get this: He is not all too happy about his incarceration.

Shocking, no?

What is shocking, however, is that he has a major beef with Mr. HopeyChange himself - President Barack Hussein Obama.

A Guantanamo inmate captured in Afghanistan at the age of 14 has become the first to give an interview from inside the camp, claiming he was beaten by his jailors.

Oh my God! How can this be? I demand that every single member of the installation be immediately arrested and held without bail - all on the testimony of this honest and trustworthy individual.

Mohammed al-Gharani, who has spent seven years in the camp, said that he had been hit with batons until his teeth broke and tear-gassed after refusing to leave his cell. The mistreatment started 20 days before Barack Obama became the American president, he said.

Oh, now that I believe. The guards wanted to cash in on some real quality stick time before a pink doily, underpantsy, tea party president was inaugurated.

“Since then I’ve been subjected to it almost every day,” he said. “Since Obama took charge he has not shown us that anything will change.”

Now see? This is where Mohammed really frakked up. When you are slated for release, the last thing you want to do is criticize the warden. Especially if that warden does not take criticism too well. In about two days, we’ll see Mohammed floating in the Caribbean Sea, courtesy of Obama’s Chicago flunkies.

Mr Guarani, whose family is from Chad but who grew up in Saudi Arabia, is one of a number of Guantanamo prisoners whose release has been ordered by an American judge. Evidence that he had fought with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan was found to be “unreliable”.

Such prisoners have been allowed to make phone calls to members of their families, but Mr Guarani spoke to a former Guantanamo inmate who works for al-Jazeera, the international Arabic television channel, instead.

Wait a minute. A former Gitmo detainee now works for al-Jazeera? The Hell you say!

Mr Guarani said he had refused to leave his cell because he “not been granted his rights”, such as to interact with other inmates and eat “normal food”. (H/T - UK Telegraph)

Mr. Guarani went on, stating that his other rights were violated, including the right to UFC Pay-Per-View, the right to use of the base’s pistol range, and the right to be tucked into bed every night by a “comely lass of virtue true.”

This story is despicable, primarily because Barack Obama promised to shut down the Guantanamo detention facility immediately. Not only did he break that promise, but he also continued the Bush administration’s practices of humiliation and torture. Hopefully, the mainstream media will report on this soon and rake Obama over the coals for his disgusting inaction.

Editor’s Note: For those of you from Rio Linda, all of my comments here are chock full of snarkasm. I don’t believe one word of Guarani’s story. You shouldn’t, either.

Topics: Snarkasm, War On Terror |

8 Responses to “Gitmo Inmate: Obama Changed Nothing”

  1. John D Says:
    April 16th, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    Hate speech, that’s what it is. Rush Limbaugh probably put him up to it. Damn neocon jihadis!

  2. dragonlady474 Says:
    April 16th, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    off topic, but I have another blog (linked on my name)…lol

  3. dragonlady474 Says:
    April 16th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    first link was wrong…sorry

  4. Sully Says:
    April 17th, 2009 at 7:08 am

    Can’t we lojak these clowns before releasing them….

  5. Wyatt Earp Says:
    April 17th, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    John D - He must be one of those “right wing extremists.”

    DL474 - Got it. Linked it in the sidebar.

    Sully - Tracking system under their scalps. Me likey!

  6. Alan B Says:
    April 17th, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    All his claims MIGHT be true. (I doubt it very much but there is a theoretical chance)

    BUT since this comes straight from the Jihadist playbook to be used whether you have suffered or not, it shouldn’t be taken seriously without genuine evidence (and injuries that could be selk-inflicted are not enough).

  7. Alan B Says:
    April 17th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    Hmm. On re-reading, what is a selk-inflicted injury? An elk-inflicted injury or a self-inflicted injury make more sense.

  8. Jon Brooks Says:
    April 17th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Alan. Could that injury have come from those special programs in the slammer where they raise service dog puppies, only in this case..service elk? Maybe it happened during mating season. Those elk are pretty touchy then. OMG Just memory flashed on the ..seeing eye cat..episode from Police Squad.