The Washington Free Beacon published excerpts from the memos of Hillary Clinton’s closest friend, Diane Blair. The excerpts show Clinton as a cold, calculating woman; in other words, there are few surprises.
On May 12, 1992, Stan Greenberg and Celinda Lake, top pollsters for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign, issued a confidential memo. The memo’s subject was “Research on Hillary Clinton.” Their conclusion: “What voters find slick in Bill Clinton, they find ruthless in Hillary.”
The full memo is one of many previously unpublished documents contained in the archive of one of Hillary Clinton’s best friends and advisers, documents that portray the former first lady, secretary of State, and potential 2016 presidential candidate as a strong, ambitious, and ruthless Democratic operative.
Of course, when you get down to brass
balls tacks, Hillary Clinton is the same woman both conservatives and liberals have despised since 1992:
…When [Bill] Clinton finally admitted to the relationship [with Monica Lewinsky] after repeated denials, Hillary Clinton defended her husband in a phone call with Blair. She said her husband had made a mistake by fooling around with the “narcissistic loony toon” Lewinsky, but was driven to it in part by his political adversaries, the loneliness of the presidency, and her own failures as a wife.
Typical liberal thinking. No one ever takes any personal responsibility. Shame on you, conservatives; YOU forced Bill Clinton to get a hummer from a fat chick!
For all the imperfections (read: borderline treasonous inaction) of Hillary Clinton, I never in a million years thought she would be taken down by a fellow member of the Obama administration.
If this is true, Hillary Clinton is more despicable than I ever imagined.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, a likely Democratic Party standard-bearer in the 2016 presidential contest, staked out her military-related positions in the 2008 race based on how they would play politically, according to a former secretary of defense who served in both the Obama and Bush administrations.
Describing a “remarkable” exchange he witnessed, Robert Gates writes in a book due out next week that “Hillary told the president that her opposition to the  surge in Iraq had been political because she was facing him in the Iowa primary.”
Disgusting. Clinton put her own political aspirations ahead of the safety of our troops in Iraq.
Your next president is here! Why not hop aboard the bandwagon before her inaugural?
Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign has rented its email list to Ready for Hillary, the super PAC laying the groundwork for a potential second attempt at the White House.
On Sunday, the group emailed the Clinton list offering free “I’m Ready for Hillary” bumper stickers, but unlike dozens of recent emails from the group offering swag, this one had the return address firstname.lastname@example.org.
Super PACs are not allowed to directly coordinate with candidates or campaigns, but because Clinton is not a declared candidate there is nothing improper about the list rental. But it is the latest indication of how seriously Clinton is considering another bid for the Oval Office.
Philly talk show host Chris Stigall refers to the Hillary rehash campaign as “Vote Vag, 2016.” Since they can’t run on issues, the Democrats will talk about firsts. In 2008, you were a racist if you didn’t vote for the first African-American president. In 2016, you’ll be a sexist if you don’t vote for the first Vagina-American president. If you don’t think this strategy will work, you’re kidding yourself. She’ll win, even with the Sword of Benghazi hanging over her head…
The next President of the United States was heckled during a speech in Buffalo last night, and during the exchange, Hillary Clinton stated the future “doesn’t include yelling.”
“Because we can’t move from crisis to crisis, we have to be willing to come together as citizens to focus on the kind of future we want,” she said. As the shouts grew louder from an upper section of bleachers, she added, “which doesn’t include yelling. It includes sitting down and talking.”
During the question-and-answer session, the former first lady deflected the inevitable question about whether she’d run for president by saying she hoped whoever ran would be able to “isolate the extreme voices” and allow the majority of people to be heard.
“I’m hoping we will — move away from the slash and burn politics, the name calling, the excessive partisanship that we’ve seen too much of lately,” she said.
I’d point out the obscenely hypocritical stance of Shrillary’s statement here, but what difference, at this point, does it make?
Ladies and gentlemen, Hillary Clinton is throwing her stretched-out cone bra into the 2016 ring. The next President of the United States is already taking pot shots at her assumed competitors.
Up first, Vice-President Dimwit.
[S]tate Rep. Tom Taylor, R-Dunwoody, said the former first lady dropped a huge hint. “I know she’s running for president now, because toward the end, she was asked about the Osama bin Laden raid. She took 25 minutes to answer,” Taylor said. “Without turning the knife too deeply, she put it to [Vice President Joe] Biden.”
Time and time again, Taylor said, Clinton mentioned the vice president’s opposition to the raid, while characterizing herself and Leon Panetta, then director of the Central Intelligence Agency, as the action’s most fierce advocates.
I know what you’re thinking: “But Wyatt, her involvement in the Benghazi coverup will destroy her POTUS aspirations!” If you swallow that tripe, you’re dumber than one of Bill Clinton’s side pieces. I am surprised, however, she took the time to attack a man who was once fired from an M&M factory for throwing away the W’s.
Hillary Clinton will be presented with the 2013 Liberty Medal in Philly on September 10th, a day before the one year anniversary of the Benghazi terror attacks.
Ambassador Chris Stevens was unavailable for comment.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose lifelong public service career includes turns as secretary of state, presidential candidate, senator and first lady, is the recipient of the 2013 Liberty Medal.
Liberty Medal sponsors said Clinton’s nearly four decades of public service exemplify the qualities that the award was established to honor, from her groundbreaking outreach to global leaders to her continuing work to advance opportunities for the world’s girls and women.
Sponsors cited Clinton’s work as secretary of state from Jan. 2009 to Feb. 2013, when she traveled to 80-plus countries — more than any of her predecessors — “as a champion of human rights, democracy, civil society and opportunities for women and girls around the world.”
I’d be more outraged, but what difference, at this point, does it make?
Hollywood casting directors are busy scouring the Earth to find an actress capable of playing America’s worst Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. The actresses up for the role are a laugh riot. It’s as if casting has never seen Her Thighness.
Scarlett Johansson’s rumored next role will see her in far more conservative attire, as it is said that the 28-year-old is set to portray Hilary Clinton in the upcoming biopic, Rodham.
The actress, naturally blonde, has not secured the role just yet: she is apparently up against Jessica Chastain, Amanda Seyfried and Reese Witherspoon.
ScarJo? Seriously? Will they give her cankle implants for the production stills? Rush Limbaugh had a great line yesterday: “The makeup artist for this film will win an Academy Award.”
A whistleblower witness to September’s Benghazi terror attacks is claiming then-Secretary of State cut counterterror officials out of the loop as the incident unfolded; a decision that probably cost American lives.
I think it’s safe to say Clinton’s presidential aspirations are now effectively destroyed.
On the night of Sept. 11, as the Obama administration scrambled to respond to the Benghazi terror attacks, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a key aide effectively tried to cut the department’s own counterterrorism bureau out of the chain of reporting and decision-making, according to a “whistle-blower” witness from that bureau who will soon testify to the charge before Congress, Fox News has learned.
That witness is Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for operations in the agency’s counterterrorism bureau. [T]he veteran counterterrorism official concluded on Sept. 11 that Clinton and Kennedy tried to cut the counterterrorism bureau out of the loop as they and other Obama administration officials weighed how to respond to — and characterize — the Benghazi attacks.
If you remember, Clinton blamed the attack on protests resulting from a YouTube video; a video no one saw. That excuse was a complete fabrication, and the video creator’s life was virtually destroyed by the Obama administration.
This despicable coverup occurred because Barack Obama had an election to win. But hey, “what difference at this point does it make?”
UPDATE: If you’re on Twitter, follow CBS News’ Sharyl Atkisson right now! If not, click the link, as she has more breaking Benghazi news.
Why would I say that? Because it takes gigantic balls to say what she did yesterday.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was asked about ascertaining whether the Benghazi terror attack was the result of a protest by Senator Ron Johnson. “What difference, at this point, does it make?” Clinton shouted, seemingly losing her cool.
“With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?”
Let’s pretend for a second that anyone in the Obama administration gives a rat’s arse about the four dead Americans… It makes a difference, Hillary, because you, the “president,” Susan Rice, and Jay Carney all took to the airwaves in the days after the attack and blamed it on a YouTube video. A video no one saw.
It makes a difference, Hillary, because you told Charles Woods (father of the murdered Ty Woods) you would have the filmmaker “arrested and prosecuted.”
It makes a difference, Hillary, because this corrupt administration’s excuse for these murders was based upon a lie. That lie was the basis of the cover-up and goes toward your credibility (or lack thereof).
Video of Clinton’s faux outrage is below the fold.
Remember the Benghazi terror attack? The one where four of our men – including our ambassador to Libya – were murdered? The one where the Obama administration ordered rescue teams to stand down? Yeah, that national embarrassment is back in the spotlight.
So is Hillary Clinton: our other national embarrassment.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton won’t testify to Congress next week on Benghazi, after fainting and suffering a concussion Saturday and due to her ongoing stomach ailment.
“While suffering from a stomach virus, Secretary Clinton became dehydrated and fainted, sustaining a concussion,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Philippe Reines said in a statement. “She has been recovering at home and will continue to be monitored regularly by her doctors. At their recommendation, she will continue to work from home next week…”
Deputy Secretaries of State Bill Burns and Tom Nides will both testify in Clinton’s place, according to the office of Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry.
This may shock you, but John Kerry has no problem with the Hill-dabeast ducking her responsibility to testify. In fact, he practically applauded it through his spokeswoman: “the nation’s best interests are served by the report and hearings proceeding as scheduled with senior officials appearing in her place.”
No, Mr. Ed, the nation’s best interests are served by uncovering the truth. Your – and your party’s – best interests are served by keeping Hillary under wraps; preferably until she announces his presidential run.