Olivia Munn Gets Maxim-um Exposure
By Wyatt Earp | January 14, 2011
Olivia Munn’s Maxim cover is coming under fire for being too risque. Because, you know, Maxim usually puts teddy bears and babies on their covers, and not scantily-clad women.
Maxim, the bawdy men’s magazine, isn’t exactly known for the modesty of its cover subjects. But at least one observer says that the February issue featuring “Perfect Couples” star Olivia Munn wearing little more than a pair of verrrry transparent lace panties is going a bit too far.
“It’s disgusting,” Dan Gainor, Vice President of Business & Culture at the Media Research Center, tells FOX411.“Maxim has moved their magazine from tawdry to full-on pornography.”
With America now privy to Munn’s personal grooming habits, Gainor predicts that retailers will race to put the issue under the counter.
Sorry, can’t hear you; I’m racing to my local retailer! If you want to see the cover, it’s below the fold.
Too risque? It’s not going to make the front page of the Christian Science Monitor, but it’s not terribly obscene. At least, not to me.
Topics: Babes | 23 Comments »
January 14th, 2011 at 8:34 am
That’s over at DPUD, I thought it was Megan Fox.
They must have the same body and fender man.
January 14th, 2011 at 8:36 am
Veeshir – Thank God for that, huh?
January 14th, 2011 at 8:41 am
I think the cover is horrible!
That shirt covers way too much!
January 14th, 2011 at 8:42 am
“It’s disgusting,”
No, Ron Jeremy in a “a pair of verrrry transparent lace panties” is disgusting. Olivia Munn is most definitely not. Double standard? You betcha!
January 14th, 2011 at 8:52 am
It’s the usual double standard… She has too much on for some, and is “nearly” naked to others… Personally, I think it’s pretty nice
January 14th, 2011 at 9:14 am
Nice panties. I really don’t have anything against Olivia Munn, except for the fact that she bores me to death.
However, I am interested in the 57 beers that will solve all my problems. Do you think you could do a post on that?
January 14th, 2011 at 9:28 am
Lou – Agreed. The shirt should match the panties.
John D. – No kidding. Ron Jeremy should always wear a suit of armor.
Old NFO – I think it’s fine, too. Perfect for most romantic occasions.
Mrs. Crankipants – I guarantee one of them is Guinness.
January 14th, 2011 at 9:54 am
Howdy Wyatt – well I think that cover is just, uh, well……………fine and dandy! Long as it’s not displayed where children can see it.
But I can.
Seriously, what’s the big deal over this? She’s a physically attractive woman showing off her assets. On the cover of a Men’s magazine. So?
January 14th, 2011 at 10:31 am
IMHO, that is one classy pose for a classy lady. Other (FEMALE!) celebrities could take lessons from her.
And Ron Jeremy should never be mentioned here ever again!
January 14th, 2011 at 10:40 am
Real – I don’t get the hubbub. It’s not like she’s naked – of which I would also approve.
Robert B. – What, you don’t like the hedgehog?
January 14th, 2011 at 11:24 am
To paraphrase Robin Williams in “Good Morning Vietnam:” “Dan, never have I met a man in more desperate need of a good blowjob.”
Wonder where he looks at the beach or the town pool?
January 14th, 2011 at 11:27 am
Wyatt — I picturing a suit of armor with hair stucking out of all the joints. Thank you so much.
Chain mail would probably bikini-wax the poor bastid to death.
January 14th, 2011 at 11:52 am
Mrs. C: Good catch! I hadn’t realized there was writing on the cover!
January 14th, 2011 at 12:34 pm
What are they getting their nickers in a twist over!
January 14th, 2011 at 12:39 pm
57 beers… I don’t see it
January 14th, 2011 at 12:41 pm
Richard – He looks at his shoes, I guess.
Proof – Chicks are good at seeing what our eyes are incapable of viewing.
Ajdshootist – Apparently, the knickers!
Roger – After 57 beers, I see all sorts of bizarre things.
January 14th, 2011 at 12:43 pm
Ooorrr, All of the sudden I feel like going out for some shaved ice
January 14th, 2011 at 1:43 pm
Can you publish the highlights of the ‘Threesome Operator Manual’?
January 14th, 2011 at 2:16 pm
Roger – Well crafted, sir!
Marvin – I would, but unattractive people can’t view that section, so I don’t know what’s in it.
January 14th, 2011 at 6:06 pm
Looks “pretty” good to Me!!!
January 14th, 2011 at 11:00 pm
It’s not like they have Goofus and Gallant in a “comprimising” position on the cover of Highlights.
January 15th, 2011 at 5:02 am
Ron Jeremy is an inspiration for all men who aren’t good looking.
If Ron Jeremy can get laid, so can we.
January 15th, 2011 at 11:35 am
The only problem I can see is she needs less shirt