<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Rejects McCain Article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/</link>
	<description>I have tactical command that supercedes your rank, they will walk away and you will let them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:54:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glocksman</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8643</link>
		<dc:creator>Glocksman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8643</guid>
		<description>Forgot to add that Emperor Misha at the AIR despises McCain almost as much as he does Obama.
I didn&#039;t mean to imply that the &#039;Rottie&#039; is in the tank for McCain. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to add that Emperor Misha at the AIR despises McCain almost as much as he does Obama.<br />
I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that the &#8216;Rottie&#8217; is in the tank for McCain. <img src='http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glocksman</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8642</link>
		<dc:creator>Glocksman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8642</guid>
		<description>Heh...
I read blogs ranging from the daily Kos and balloon-juice to Riehl world view and the Anti idiotarian rottweiler, and they all complain that the MSM is biased against their particular candidate and can point to specific examples of such bias.

My purely unscientific viewpoint after such exposure is that the MSM is primarily &lt;strong&gt;lazy&lt;/strong&gt;, instead of biased.

It takes little effort to pass off a press release as &#039;news&#039; compared to digging up the dirt and finding real newsworthy tidbits, and like most people they go after the low hanging fruit instead of digging up the real news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230;<br />
I read blogs ranging from the daily Kos and balloon-juice to Riehl world view and the Anti idiotarian rottweiler, and they all complain that the MSM is biased against their particular candidate and can point to specific examples of such bias.</p>
<p>My purely unscientific viewpoint after such exposure is that the MSM is primarily <strong>lazy</strong>, instead of biased.</p>
<p>It takes little effort to pass off a press release as &#8216;news&#8217; compared to digging up the dirt and finding real newsworthy tidbits, and like most people they go after the low hanging fruit instead of digging up the real news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyatt Earp</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8639</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt Earp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8639</guid>
		<description>Yet another example of the non-existent media bias: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080722/pl_politico/11939&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John McCain&#039;s gaffes piling up?&lt;/a&gt;  Are you frakkin&#039; kidding me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another example of the non-existent media bias: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080722/pl_politico/11939" rel="nofollow">John McCain&#8217;s gaffes piling up?</a>  Are you frakkin&#8217; kidding me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glocksman</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8633</link>
		<dc:creator>Glocksman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8633</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Glocksman - Yeah, we can’t have negative campaign ads in a political election. The Obamessiah would never stand for that!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The problem with using negative ads is that they drop the intended beneficiary as well as the one who is being attacked.
The art involved in using them is making sure that your negatives increase at a lower rate than the target&#039;s are.

Can McCain&#039;s people pull it off?
Possibly, but going negative so early isn&#039;t a good sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Glocksman &#8211; Yeah, we can’t have negative campaign ads in a political election. The Obamessiah would never stand for that!</p></blockquote>
<p>The problem with using negative ads is that they drop the intended beneficiary as well as the one who is being attacked.<br />
The art involved in using them is making sure that your negatives increase at a lower rate than the target&#8217;s are.</p>
<p>Can McCain&#8217;s people pull it off?<br />
Possibly, but going negative so early isn&#8217;t a good sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skye</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8623</link>
		<dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8623</guid>
		<description>Howard, 

Has the MSM ever had objectivity, integrity and choice in reporting the story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard, </p>
<p>Has the MSM ever had objectivity, integrity and choice in reporting the story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8609</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8609</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;THE FOURTH ESTATE IS STARTING TO RESEMBLE 
THE THIRD REICH&lt;/strong&gt;
Like Joseph Goebbels, American main stream media has replaced objectivity, integrity, and free choice with one sided reporting, that reflects their bias for Barack Obama. The American Press used to be the last bastion of truth. When special interests got out of hand, the press came to the rescue and exposed them to the public. Now, the press is the special interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>THE FOURTH ESTATE IS STARTING TO RESEMBLE<br />
THE THIRD REICH</strong><br />
Like Joseph Goebbels, American main stream media has replaced objectivity, integrity, and free choice with one sided reporting, that reflects their bias for Barack Obama. The American Press used to be the last bastion of truth. When special interests got out of hand, the press came to the rescue and exposed them to the public. Now, the press is the special interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typicalwhitey</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8592</link>
		<dc:creator>Typicalwhitey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8592</guid>
		<description>Randall one thing I will never be is a loser.
You can bank on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall one thing I will never be is a loser.<br />
You can bank on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyatt Earp</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8591</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt Earp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8591</guid>
		<description>Randal - So, you&#039;re an ageist?  I thought you liberals were all &quot;love one another&quot; types?

TW - I keep hearing Romney or Jindal.  I would be more than happy with either.

BobG - Hell no!

Trek - Most newspapers are failing nowadays. And after stories like these, I take immense pleasure in their downfall.

RT - I left the duct tape in the tool shed.

DesertSage - No it won&#039;t.  The liberals won&#039;t believe it, even when the proof is staring them in the face.

TW - He&#039;s not.  Trust me.

DesertSage - Again, he&#039;s not.

AJ - But the clothing should not contribute to global warming.

Jim - Obama is all for the Fairness Doctrine, too.  I wonder if he&#039;ll apply it to the newspapers and the nightly news.  Signs point to no.

Randal - Did we have the election already and no one told me?

Glocksman - Yeah, we can&#039;t have negative campaign ads in a political election.  The Obamessiah would never stand for that!

Bawahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randal &#8211; So, you&#8217;re an ageist?  I thought you liberals were all &#8220;love one another&#8221; types?</p>
<p>TW &#8211; I keep hearing Romney or Jindal.  I would be more than happy with either.</p>
<p>BobG &#8211; Hell no!</p>
<p>Trek &#8211; Most newspapers are failing nowadays. And after stories like these, I take immense pleasure in their downfall.</p>
<p>RT &#8211; I left the duct tape in the tool shed.</p>
<p>DesertSage &#8211; No it won&#8217;t.  The liberals won&#8217;t believe it, even when the proof is staring them in the face.</p>
<p>TW &#8211; He&#8217;s not.  Trust me.</p>
<p>DesertSage &#8211; Again, he&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>AJ &#8211; But the clothing should not contribute to global warming.</p>
<p>Jim &#8211; Obama is all for the Fairness Doctrine, too.  I wonder if he&#8217;ll apply it to the newspapers and the nightly news.  Signs point to no.</p>
<p>Randal &#8211; Did we have the election already and no one told me?</p>
<p>Glocksman &#8211; Yeah, we can&#8217;t have negative campaign ads in a political election.  The Obamessiah would never stand for that!</p>
<p>Bawahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glocksman</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8578</link>
		<dc:creator>Glocksman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8578</guid>
		<description>IIRC, the Times&#039;s objection to McCain&#039;s piece is that, unlike Obama&#039;s op-ed, it spends a lot of its length attacking his opponent rather than explaining just what his own policy would be.

From reading both pieces, it&#039;s a fair criticism though I can see how one would disagree.

Frankly, McCain should go on the offensive and highlight just how he&#039;d be different from Obama WRT foreign policy (where Obama&#039;s weakest), and from GWB on domestic policy (where McCain himself is weakest), instead of launching defensive negative ads that only serve to remind people of just how weak a candidate in total he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC, the Times&#8217;s objection to McCain&#8217;s piece is that, unlike Obama&#8217;s op-ed, it spends a lot of its length attacking his opponent rather than explaining just what his own policy would be.</p>
<p>From reading both pieces, it&#8217;s a fair criticism though I can see how one would disagree.</p>
<p>Frankly, McCain should go on the offensive and highlight just how he&#8217;d be different from Obama WRT foreign policy (where Obama&#8217;s weakest), and from GWB on domestic policy (where McCain himself is weakest), instead of launching defensive negative ads that only serve to remind people of just how weak a candidate in total he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randal Graves</title>
		<link>http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/2008/07/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8573</link>
		<dc:creator>Randal Graves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/?p=3603#comment-8573</guid>
		<description>Hey  TW, sucks to on the losing side, eh?

bwahahahahahaha.  :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey  TW, sucks to on the losing side, eh?</p>
<p>bwahahahahahaha.  <img src='http://supportyourlocalgunfighter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

