Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Cop Land

« Hockey Night In Philly | Main | »

Kate Winslet Shows Off Her “Real Body”

By Wyatt Earp | July 21, 2011

I love Kate Winslet. I always have. I love her gorgeous face, her British accent, and her real curves. Now, she’s flaunting her “real body” in a new ad campaign.

Kate Winslet may not be a size zero, but that won’t stop her from forging a successful modeling career. The actress showed off her curves as the new face of U.S knitwear label St. John for their 2011 autumn campaign.

Kate says: “With St. John You can look extremely chic without trying too hard. You don’t feel as though they are clothes that only a model would be able to wear. And obviously I am not a model, I don’t have a model’s body, I have a real shape.”

And I thank you for it, Kate.

Topics: Babes | 17 Comments »

17 Responses to “Kate Winslet Shows Off Her “Real Body””

  1. Jon Brooks Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 7:58 am

    UUnablle tooo tpe, starring att pikture.

  2. Dannytheman Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 9:09 am

    OK, all of us Christina fans can always appreciate a girl with curves!!

  3. Wyatt Earp Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 9:11 am

    Jon – Completely understandable.

    Danny – It’s why I posted her today.

  4. John D Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 9:21 am

    …I don’t have a model’s body…

    In other words, she doesn’t look like she subsists on a diet of heroin and Red Bull.

  5. Wyatt Earp Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 10:37 am

    John D. – And unlike those waifs, Kate has a fantastic rack.

  6. richard mcenroe Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    What’s British for “ROWR!”…


  7. Wyatt Earp Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    Richard – That’ll do!

  8. sifty Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 12:57 pm


  9. bob (either orr) Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    Mmmmmm. Curves.

  10. Wyatt Earp Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    Sifty – Yeah, she is chock full of teh hawt.

    Bob – And me without my 4-wheel drive.

  11. David, infamous sockpuppet Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 1:19 pm

    No, no, I would have to say that I would throw her out of my bed.

    BTW, in case anyone is interested, I have a bridge for sale, cheap.

  12. Dustin Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    It’s amazing to me that this standard of beauty is considered inferior by fashion magazines, NYT’s fashion section, fashion designers, etc, all of whom prefer a woman to have minimal body fat, and thus, very little indication of a woman’s features.

    I have heard a theory that it’s because a woman with low body fat looks like a young boy vaguely, but I think that’s a little silly. I think it’s just a runaway glitch in fashion, where everyone outdoes the last guy.

    Either way, what a bunch of brain-dead conformists. It’s only natural that this kind of figure is more appealing than the skeleton look.

  13. Wyatt Earp Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    David – You’d throw her out of bed to bang her on the floor. Or, is that just me who would do that?

    Dustin – This! That’s why I did chicks like Kate and Christina Hendricks. You can keep those waifs for the next production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream.

    Yeah, I just threw Shakespeare at ya.

  14. I R A Darth Aggie Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    I’ll be in my bunk.

  15. richard mcenroe Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 3:41 pm

    Yeh, but the waifs are playing Puck, not Titania…

  16. RogerDee Says:
    July 21st, 2011 at 7:06 pm


  17. Bob G. Says:
    July 23rd, 2011 at 9:28 am

    Now if she (or Christina) doesn’t put spring into a man’s step, he’d best see to checking his pulse.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Stay safe.