Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Cop Land

« “Start” Me Up | Main | Another Facebook Security Fail »

No Cheerleaders At The Super Bowl?

By Wyatt Earp | February 5, 2011

Well, it’s for Ben Roethlisberger.

For the first time in the showcase event’s 45-year history there will be no scantily-clad cheerleaders on the sidelines at a Super Bowl. The Pittsburgh Steelers and Green Bay Packers are two of a half dozen National Football League teams that don’t have cheerleaders. The others comprise Cleveland Browns, New York Giants, Chicago Bears and Detroit Lions.

“We will have a great game, we don’t need eye candy,” quipped Pittsburgh Steelers guard Trai Essex.

You sir, are an idiot. Everyone needs eye candy. It’s what separates us from the animals.

Topics: Babes, WTF? | 21 Comments »

21 Responses to “No Cheerleaders At The Super Bowl?”

  1. Dustyvet Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    Darn Wyatt, I’ve had seven cold showers in the past 30 minutes…:)

  2. Crusty Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 1:31 pm

    Are these girls from the naval academy

  3. Dannytheman Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    Football with no cheerleaders??? Sad, sad day!
    I would have imported some. Maybe a Pro Bowl for cheerleaders from other teams?

  4. proof Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    “No Cheerleaders At The Super Bowl?”
    Not so “super” then, is it?

    Crusty: Do you remember what a “naval destroyer” is?
    That’s a Hula Hoop with a nail in it!

  5. joated Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 2:16 pm

    No cheerleaders?
    You sure this game’s being played in Dallas?

  6. Mr. M Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    That is because people from Pittsburgh and Greenbay don’t want distractions when they are looking at guys in tights humped over.

  7. Dr. Evil Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 2:42 pm

    Have to show texans cheerleaders in a Super Bowl post eh Wyatt? What a deliciously bastardish taunt towards me. Thanks…

  8. GroovyVic Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    Oh please. They already play like freakin’ girls, why do you need more women on the field?

  9. Wyatt Earp Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    DustyVet – Just trying to keep you awake.

    Crusty – Yes, and they should be prepare to be boarded!

    Danny – Or Victoria’s Secret models, at least.

    Proof – Nicely done there.

    Joated – Amazing, ain’t it?

    Mr. M. – Well, that Aaron Rodgers is hawt!

    Dr. Evil – Remember yesterday’s “man boobs” comment? We’re now even.

    GroovyVic – Good point., Heaven forbid someone make a helmet-first tackle.

  10. Watuschski Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    How the hell am I supposed to concentrate on the game without the cheerleaders!

  11. Kim Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    A football game where women are not being hyper-sexualized and turned into object? Is it possible?

    Eh, they’ll make up for it in the commercials.

  12. AJ Lynch Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    Picking nits but as a grad of a Jesuit university, you should know the correct phrasing is “fewer potential victims”.

  13. richard mcenroe Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 6:32 pm

    You do realize that without the cheerleaders to distract him, Rothlisberger will be up in the stands, right.

    I predict he gets sacked three times while scoping out those great jaloobies in the twelfth row….

  14. GroovyVic Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 7:10 pm

    Nah. Mendenhall will hump on him like he did after they won the AFC Championship game.

  15. Wyatt Earp Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 7:14 pm

    Watuschski – You can always hire some to come to your home.

    Kim – One can only hope!

    AJ – I went to a Jesuit university and I think it’s fine. *Gotta dumb it down for some of my readers here. You guys know who you are.*

    Richard – Please don’t mention Roethlisberger and “sack” in the same sentence.

    GroovyVic – Not that there’s anything wrong with that . . .

  16. Old NFO Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 7:14 pm

    Their (and our) loss… but they WOULD be freezing pieces/parts off on the sidelines in Green Bay… Just sayin…

  17. The Way It Is Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 8:07 pm

    America hates football, anyway. So if they don’t want to sell this faggotis media sport to us we will all kiss these faggotis good-effing-riddance out of America. SUPER BOWL IS DEAD AND DONE!!!! LET’S ALL GET BACK TO THE INDY 500!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8D

  18. Fenway_Nation Says:
    February 6th, 2011 at 12:58 am


    ‘Great game’ my Irish tucchus….am I like one of the only dozen or so Americans who don’t give two turds in a bowl about the Packs or Pittsburgh?

  19. Kim Says:
    February 6th, 2011 at 3:34 am

    I don’t care either. But in this case, my opinion doesn’t count. I’m a girl. :p

  20. Rick Says:
    February 6th, 2011 at 10:35 am

    Same here Fenway

  21. Wyatt Earp Says:
    February 6th, 2011 at 12:16 pm

    Old NFO – And they wouldn’t look very sexy in parkas.

    TWII – Yeah, I can’t believe what low ratings the NFL has anymore. Worse than tennis.

    Fenway – I probably won’t watch much of the game at all. Really don’t care who wins.

    Kim – Good point. Now get in the kitchen and bake me a pie!

    Rick – I’d care if the Jets beat the Steelers in the AFC Championship, but as it stands, I don’t care much, either.