Comments on: Lindsay Lohan: Delusional Idiot

By: bob (either orr)

bob (either orr) — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:03:57 +0000

Sign on Lindsay Lohan’s forehead: Space for rent within. Cheap. Never used (unlike the rest of her body).

By: Jon Brooks

Jon Brooks — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:14:45 +0000

She’s trying to take ..milk.. from a baby???? Ohhhh I told em I did, once you let em take the candy from the baby, they will go after the milk too!

By: yeahright

yeahright — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:39:36 +0000

Pathetic. Enough said. Hey – Lindsay, here are some other words you should sue for, when people use them:

Skank, Moron, Idiot, Slug, Stupid, Vapid, Vain, Shallow, Useless, Pathetic, Drunk, Arrested.

These are all words that people think when your name is mentioned. Not just Milkaholic…

By: Ingineer66

Ingineer66 — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:47:30 +0000

Craziness. When I hear about an 18 month old named Lindsey, I always think of Lindsay Lohan.

By: Mrs. Crankipants

Mrs. Crankipants — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:11:01 +0000

When I think of “Lindsay”, I think of a brand of olives that go in my very dry Absolut martini.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:43:17 +0000

First person I thought of was Lindsay Wagner.

Hey Lohan, your a SKANK! Go away already!

By: Dennis Petty, aka MUD

Dennis Petty, aka MUD — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:04:29 +0000

This is just another attempt by a pathetic actress to milk any publicity for all it’s worth. Give it a few days and it will go away, unfortunately, Lindsey won’t. MUD

By: metoo

metoo — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:03:55 +0000

How presumptuous on her part to assume the viewing public would think of her every time the name Lindsay is mentioned. Seems to me the problem is NO ONE is thinking of Ms. Lohan these days and this is just another cheap, tawdry way to get her name back in the news front and center. She needs to just go away because frankly, no one gives a rat’s ass about her.

By: Peter B

Peter B — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:36:15 +0000

Makes me think of Groucho's classic letter to Warner Brothers...

Apparently there is more than one way of conquering a city and holding it as your own. For example, up to the time that we contemplated making this picture, I had no idea that the city of Casablanca belonged exclusively to Warner Brothers. However, it was only a few days after our announcement appeared that we received your long, ominous legal document warning us not to use the name Casablanca. It seems that in 1471, Ferdinand Balboa Warner, your great-great-grandfather, while looking for a shortcut to the city of Burbank, had stumbled on the shores of Africa and, raising his alpenstock (which he later turned in for a 100 shares of common), named it Casablanca. I just don't understand your attitude. Even if you plan on releasing your picture, I am sure that the average movie fan could learn in time to distinguish between Ingrid Bergman and Harpo. I don't know whether I could, but I certainly would like to try.

By: Wyatt Earp

Wyatt Earp — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:18:48 +0000

cbullitt – It’s a toss-up of idiocy there.

DL474 – I was briefly on Facebook, but I didn’t much care for it. Deleted my account. Sorry.

Mpur – Yeah. Bionic hawtness.