Hack Columnist Blames Victim Erin Andrews
By Wyatt Earp | July 25, 2009
You may have heard the Erin Andrews story by now, but I’ll refresh your memory if you haven’t. Andrews is a very beautiful reporter for ESPN. Recently, some sick toad filmed her in various stages of undress through a peephole in her hotel room. Said toad then released the video across the ‘net. Insanity ensues, but not from the people you would think.
Michelle Malkin has the sickening story:
Erin Andrews is an ESPN reporter. Some sick person planted hidden cameras in her hotel room and splashed video of her while she was dressing all over the Internet.
Andrews happens to be young, beautiful, and a stylish dresser — prompting USA Today columnist Christine Brennan to write on Twitter that Andrews is essentially to blame for the appalling invasion of her privacy.
(Cue Moesha voice.) “Oh, no she didn’t!”
Yes, she did:
Women sports journalists need to be smart and not play to the frat house. There are tons of nuts out there.
Erin Andrews incident is bad, but to add perspective: there are 100s of women sports journalists who have never had this happen to them.
What the Hell is wrong with people? First, you have some sick bastard filming Andrews through a peephole and selling the video to anyone and everyone. That’s bad enough. Then, you have one of Andrews’ peers claiming that she brought this on herself because she’s attractive! Pretty ig’nant, if you ask me.
Stay classy, Ms. Brennan. I am sure you are the pride of the USA Today editorial staff.
Topics: Babes, The Job | 10 Comments »
July 25th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
Women can be evil with each other.
July 25th, 2009 at 12:48 pm
Sounds like the old mare is a bit jealous of the young, cute filly with the long legs. Guess Ms. Brennan is getting a bit long in the tooth.
July 25th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Admiral – Gidda, gidda, catfight!
MeToo – I saw her photo. She’s not terrible, but Andrews makes her look that way. Someone has green eyes . . . of jealousy.
July 25th, 2009 at 4:03 pm
So much for not blaming the victim, I guess.
July 25th, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Not enough love in the world, is the perp locked up yet?
July 26th, 2009 at 12:19 am
Yeah. Lock him up!
…
Anybody got a link to that clip?
July 26th, 2009 at 1:29 am
Rushs’ “Undeniable Truth” #24
“Feminism was established as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society”.
Meow……….
July 26th, 2009 at 11:39 pm
John D – Classy, huh?
Earl – I don’t think so, but I’m sure it’s coming soon.
Woody – There was a story on Reuters that said there was a virus attached to the video links. Not worth the risk.
RAPH – Good point! I forgot that one!
July 26th, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Nah, I found the video. No virus. She’s slammin’.
October 21st, 2009 at 8:28 am
Her privacy was invaded, BUT, maybe now she knows how some of the males in the locker rooms she and other female sports reporters invade feel when they enter while the men are naked and showering. Title V11 allows for men and women to not be discriminated against in employment EXCEPT WHEN IT INVADES THE PERSONAL BODILY PRIVACY OF THE OPPOSITE GENDER. In one case it’s a peeping tom…in the other its ogling female sports reporters. Like I said…it wasn’t right. But neither are female sports reporters in a men’s locker room while their naked and showering. One is legal the other is illegal, but the legal peeping tom was granted that law by a female judge (feminist) with total disregard for the privacy rights of the men in locker rooms of America. Anyway you look at it, it’s the same, personal bodily privacy has been invaded in both instances AND ITS WRONG. Now she knows how the men feel.
Lefteddie